Our process
- Define the claim. What exactly is being said?
- Find a direct source. Prefer NIH, regulators and published studies.
- Check date and independence. Is the source current, and does it sell the product?
- Write a conclusion no stronger than the source.
How we word claims
We use tags in our own notes: verified fact, seller claim, independent evidence, limitation and unverified. Public pages use plain labels such as "the seller says" and "we found".
Evidence levels we use
| Level | Example | How we treat it |
|---|---|---|
| Strong | Randomized trial of the finished product | None found for Audifort. |
| Moderate | Trials or pooled analyses of a single ingredient | Used, with dose caveats. |
| Weak | Lab and animal work, traditional use | Described as such. |
| Marketing | Seller statements and testimonials | Attributed, not endorsed. |
What we will not publish
Fake urgency, invented ratings or testimonials, disease-cure claims or claims we cannot source.
Corrections
Email contact@audifort-supplement.com with the page, the claim and a source. We update the page and the date.
How we check prices and terms
We record them from the seller's pages and graphics on the update date. They can change.
Update schedule
We re-check pages when the seller's terms change and at least every few months.
How we handle conflicting information
When seller materials disagree, we say so, show both and tell you what to confirm.
Conflicts of interest
We earn commissions. We separate that from conclusions and disclose it near calls to action.